Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Simon Carr vs Jesper De Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carr vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Simon Carr vs Jesper De Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carr 2 - 0 Jong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carr has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jong has won 49.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carr, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 50.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carr has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 61.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carr has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jong winning 58.93% (W/L 33/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carr has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 77/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11). Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Carr winning 2 times and Jong being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Carr winning 4 and Jong winning 2. The last match between Carr and Jong was at the Potchefstroom 2 Challenger, 14-02-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Simon Carr getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carr and Jong have played a deciding set 2 times, with Carr winning 2 times and Jong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Carr winning 0, and Jong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carr has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jong has played against players with an average rank of 324.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carr has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carr has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 47.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
887
Rank
512
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
147
Rank
135
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
54% (163-138)
Career Total W/L
63% (225-135)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
60% (21-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$430,415
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Simon Carr | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 33 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:13 | 2:15:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (117/178) | 66% (128/195) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (83/117) | 68% (87/128) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (31/61) | 37% (25/67) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (10/19) | 36% (5/14) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (83/195) | 36% (64/178) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Simon Carr
Player
Jesper De Jong
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 6-1 5-7 6-4 |
Stats
Simon Carr
Player
Jesper De Jong
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
111)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
111)
109
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Simon Carr | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (21/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (49/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (431/384) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (14/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 179 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 99 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:55:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 316.11 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (1549/2639) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (1094/1549) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (544/1090) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 48% (112/235) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (1014/2544) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (17/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 95% (19/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 5% (19/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 19% (16/3) |
Simon Carr Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Francois Musitelli
Player
Simon Carr
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Carr
Player
Leonardo Rossi
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Simon Carr
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Simon Carr
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Simon Carr
47%
(
45 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
44 of
56)
62%
(
31 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Simon Carr
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Simon Carr
Player
Donald Young
55%
(
57 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Simon Carr
Player
Nick Chappell
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Simon Carr
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Simon Carr
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jesper De Jong
70%
(
78 of
112)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
124)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
77 of
154)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
52%
(
40 of
77)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
37%
(
57 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
157
Total Points Won
146
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jeff Wolf
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
75%
(
81 of
108)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Carr Vs Jong Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Carr are available here and Jong photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jesper De Jong
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
